Drawing for NUREAM

USPTO serial 98108921

NUREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 643
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip J. Cardinale

Philip J. Cardinale SMITH ANDERSON BLOUNT DORSETT MITCHEL & JERNIGAN L150 Fayetteville Street, Suite 2300Raleigh, NC 27601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for receiving, logging, analyzing and transmitting biometric and neural data; software for receiving, logging, analyzing and transmitting biometric and neural data to monitor and improve sleep; Sensors for scientific use to gather human biometric data embedded in fabrics, textiles, sheets, blankets, pillowcases and bed linens, smart textiles, smart fabrics and textiles, sheets, blankets, pillowcases and bed linens to capture, measure and monitor biometric and neural data; Sensors for scientific use to gather human biometric data embedded in fabrics and textiles, sheets, blankets, pillowcases and bed linens for neurosensing, neurostimulation and neuromodulation for improving sleep patterns; Sensors for scientific use to gather human biometric data embedded in fabrics and textiles with conductive fibers for neurosensing, neurostimulation and neuromodulationACTIVE—
010Sensors for medical use to gather human biometric data embedded in fabrics, textiles, sheets, blankets, pillowcases and bed linens, smart textiles, smart fabrics and textiles, sheets, blankets, pillowcases and bed linens to capture, measure and monitor biometric and neural data; Sensors for medical use to gather human biometric data embedded in fabrics and textiles, sheets, blankets, pillowcases and bed linens for neurosensing, neurostimulation and neuromodulation for improving sleep patterns; Sensors for medical use to gather human biometric data embedded in fabrics and textiles with conductive fibers for neurosensing, neurostimulation and neuromodulationACTIVE—
042Software as a Service featuring software for receiving, logging, analyzing and transmitting biometric and neural data; software as a service featuring software for receiving, logging, analyzing and transmitting biometric and neural data to monitor and improve sleepACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2024ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 23, 2024PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 9, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2024EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 19, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance