Drawing for STRATUSLIVE IGNITE AI

USPTO serial 98109948

STRATUSLIVE IGNITE AI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILLER, CHARLES FREDERICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRATUSLIVE IGNITE AI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy G. Pruett

Amy G. Pruett Williams Mullen, c/o IP Docketing200 South 10th Street, Suite 1600Williams Mullen CenterRichmond, VA 23219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing software as a service (SAAS) services featuring non-downloadable software for tracking and managing workplace donations and fundraising effortsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2024ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 21, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 21, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance