USPTO serial 98110395
SAFE CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFE CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leopold Lueddemann
Leopold Lueddemann BROTHERS SMITH, LLP2033 N MAIN STREET #720WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, electric, photographic, cinematographic instruments in the nature of photographic cameras, cinematographic cameras, audio recording cameras, and audio recorders; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of images; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound; data processors and computers; downloadable computer application software for computers and mobile phones, namely, software for data storage and data retrieval; downloadable application software for computers and mobile phones, namely, software for data storage and retrieval of public safety surveillance data and for public and private collaboration in searching, retrieving, and forensic analysis and investigation of public safety surveillance data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technological and display services in the nature of digital image correction, restoration and enhancement of videos; monitoring technological functions of computer network systems in the field of public safety data; industrial analysis of video being forensic analysis of surveillance video for scientific research purposes; electronic storage of electronic media, namely, images, text and audio data; public document retrieval; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer networking software for audio and video surveillance data, for data storage, and for use in searching, retrieval, and forensic analysis and investigation of public safety surveillance data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |