USPTO serial 98126551
NEGIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TATE-NAGHI, JACQUELINE P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEGIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda Soofer
2840 SOUTH ALAMEDA STREETLOS ANGELES, CA 90058United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Spices; Frozen breads; Seasoning mixes; Dried herbs; Processed herb mixes, for making Advieh; Processed herb mixes, for making Ghormeh Sabzi; Processed herb, namely, herb mixes; Processed herbs, namely, herb stew mixes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Spices; Frozen breads; Seasoning mixes; Dried herbs; Processed herb mixes for making Advieh; Processed herb mixes for making Ghormeh Sabzi; Processed herbs, namely, herb mixes; Processed herbs, namely, herb stew mixes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |