USPTO serial 98131936
DRIVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLD, BARBARA NIELSEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 137
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRIVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bloomfield Hills, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Moir
38955 HILLS TECH DRIVEFARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48331United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Script writing and advertising copy writing for advertising and promotional purposes for the broadcast transmission of automotive-related information on television, radio and on other digital platforms; | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Broadcast transmission of information on television being cable television, and through streaming on the internet on digital and social media platforms, namely, information concerning local, national, and international automotive-related events; Broadcast transmission of automotive-related advertising and automotive-related promotions on cable television and on other digital platforms being cable through streaming on the internet on digital and social media platforms. where the advertisements are relevant to audiences in the local or national broadcast area; Broadcasting of automotive-related information in both live and recorded formats on television and on digital platforms, being through streaming on the internet on digital and social media platforms; Broadcasting of automotive related-information with individuals presenting the named information on cable television and digital platforms being through streaming on the internet on digital and social media platforms; Broadcasting being through streaming on the internet on digital and social media platforms of reviews of automotive-related products, presented by individuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Script writing for non-advertising purposes for the broadcast transmission of automotive-related information on television, radio and on other digital platforms being streaming on the internet and on digital and social media platforms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 9, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |