USPTO serial 98132745
QRYSTAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINDEMANN, ROBIN R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QRYSTAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea L. Arndt
Andrea L. Arndt DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1825 EYE ST. N.W., SUITE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Laser inscription of diamonds; treatment of materials, namely, affixing and embedding product authentication security devices and materials in a wide variety of products in the nature of consumer goods, gems, precious metals and their alloys, precious and semi-precious stones and critical minerals for the purpose of product serialization, authentication, and distribution track-and-trace and to protect against counterfeiting, tampering, and diversion, and to ensure the integrity of genuine products | ACTIVE | Mar 24, 2023 |
| 042 | Platform as a service (paas) featuring computer software platforms for the purpose of product serialization, authentication, tracing or tracking goods of any kind, distribution track-and-trace, and supply chain management; Platform as a service (paas) featuring computer software for accessing, reading, and tracking information in the field of jewelry on a blockchain; Platform as a service (paas) featuring computer software platforms for retail, online marketplace, and e-commerce monitoring, and consumer engagement; Platform as a service (paas) featuring computer software platforms for protecting against counterfeiting, tampering, and diversion, to ensure the integrity of genuine products throughout their lifecycle; authentication services, namely, authentication of consumer goods, gems, precious metals and their alloys, precious and semi-precious stones, critical minerals, jewelry, luxury goods, medical technology being medical devices, transportation being vehicle components, semiconductors, defense electronics, and electronic security devices using blockchain technology; Platform as a service (paas) featuring computer software platforms for scanning, registering, tracking and authenticating solid objects; Identification and authentication of data in the field of consumer goods, gems, precious metals and their alloys, precious and semi-precious stones, critical minerals using blockchain technology | ACTIVE | Mar 24, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2025 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 22, 2024 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 11, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |