Drawing for DIGITAL DISENFECTION

USPTO serial 98138600

DIGITAL DISENFECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SIEGEL, PAIGE JORDAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL DISENFECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy Embert

Amy Embert RESONANCE IP LAW, PC1968 S. COAST HWYSUITE 4129LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer simulation software for modeling human traffic patterns, air flow, and pathogen load within an environmentACTIVE—
037Consultancy relating to sanitizing industrial or commercial kitchen worktops for preparing food; Consultancy relating to sanitizing food preparation facilities; Consultancy relating to sanitizing industrial or commercial food processing equipment; Disinfecting of building interior surfaces for reducing the spread of viruses and microorganisms; Disinfecting of home interior surfaces for reducing the spread of viruses and microorganismsACTIVE—
040Sanitization of airACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for connecting, operating, and managing networked sanitization and environmental monitoring devices in the internet of things (IoT)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2024XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2024GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2024GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2024CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance