USPTO serial 98143075
BLAZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with BLAZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Creedon
James Creedon SCALE LLP5473 BLAIR ROADSUITE 100DALLAS, TX 75231Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for integration of multiple software platforms for collaboration and content generation; Computer services, namely, integration of computer software into multiple systems and networks; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence for generating customized written content and programmable content presets; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for team collaboration, project management, and content generation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for text editing, task assignment, calendaring, workflow development and sharing, document version control, database creation and management, email scheduling, newsletter development and distribution, and client campaign generation and management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for generating and editing text; Technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | Aug 18, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | PMSD | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - DENIED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |