USPTO serial 98152536
RUMBLE MUSIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VO, KOMAL MAKHDOOM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUMBLE MUSIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Longboat Key, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W. DICKERSON, JR.
ROBERT W. DICKERSON, JR. BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP444 SOUTH FLOWER ST., 24TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF LIVESTEAMING OF MUSIC, MUSICAL EVENTS, MUSIC COMMENTARY, AND RELATED CONTENT, AND BROADCASTING OF RECORDED MUSIC, MUSICAL EVENTS, MUSIC COMMENTARY, AND RELATED CONTENT INCLUDING PODCASTS RELATED TO THAT CONTENT WHICH WOULD BE AVAILABLE TO USERS VIA THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING TECHNOLOGY THAT ENABLES USERS TO TO ACCESS LIVESTREAMED AND RECORDED MUSIC, MUSICAL EVENTS, MUSIC COMMENTARY, AND RELATED CONTENT VIA THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |