USPTO serial 98152863
FULCRUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLUWE, CHERYL D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FULCRUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Puchong, Selangor, MY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore R. Remaklus
Theodore R. Remaklus Thompson Hine LLP312 Walnut Street, Suite 2000Cincinnati, OH 45202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of computer software, and consultancy services relating thereto; advisory and consultancy services relating to computer software; computer software design, development and programming services; computer support services, namely, programming and software installation, repair and maintenance services; consultancy relating to software design and development; consultancy relating to software for communication systems; design of computer programs and software relating to aircraft; design and development of navigation systems and route planning software; development and testing of computing methods, algorithms and software for processing telecommunication and navigation signals; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for use in software development, machine learning, facial and speech recognition testing, analysis and monitoring of navigation signals; testing, analysis and monitoring of system algorithms for generating telecommunications and navigation data; testing, analysis and monitoring of system algorithms for processing telecommunications and navigation data; cloud computing consultancy; consultancy services in the field of cloud computing applications and networks; design and development of operating software for accessing and using a cloud computing network; rental of operating software for accessing and using a cloud computing network; aerial surveying; quality assurance consultancy services; remote computer backup services; research and development services relating to computer hardware and computer software; research and development services relating to computer software; research services in the field of information technology; research, design and development services relating to computer programs; research, design and development services relating to data processing systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |