USPTO serial 98159515
JUXTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUXTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greensboro, NC
Greensboro, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles G. Zug
Charles G. Zug NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP301 S. COLLEGE ST.SUITE 2300, IP DEPARTMENTCHARLOTTE, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Prefabricated buildings made substantially of metal for use as unmanned autonomous retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail convenience stores; Rental and leasing of point-of-sale (POS) equipment for use in unmanned autonomous retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Merchant services, namely, payment transaction processing services; Credit card payment processing services; Debit card payment processing services; Processing of electronic wallet payments; Payment and funds verification services; Rental and leasing of prefabricated moveable buildings for use as unmanned autonomous retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Charging station services for electric vehicles; Battery charging services for motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for processing payments in unmanned autonomous retail stores; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring access control software for allowing persons to enter and exit unmanned autonomous retail stores; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring and enabling purchases of products in unmanned autonomous retail stores; Providing online, non-downloadable software for processing payments in unmanned autonomous retail stores; Providing online, non-downloadable software for allowing persons to enter and exit unmanned autonomous retail stores; Providing online, non-downloadable software for monitoring and enabling purchases of products in unmanned autonomous retail stores; Access Control as a Service (ACAAS), namely, providing online, non-downloadable software used to allow persons to enter and exit unmanned autonomous retail stores; Rental and leasing of computer hardware and electronic sensors for use in point of sale transactions in unmanned autonomous retail stores; Rental and leasing of computer hardware and electronic sensors for use in allowing entry of persons into unmanned autonomous retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gilbarco Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Gilbarco Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named JUXTA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 29, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 3, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |