USPTO serial 98165294
PRODECOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRODECOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Garth M. Dahlen
Garth M. Dahlen MENDELSOHN DUNLEAVY, P.C.1500 JOHN F. KENNEDY BLVD.TWO PENN CENTER, SUITE 910PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Decorative plastics films being semi-finished products; Plastics materials in the form of sheets; Sheets of printable polypropylene; Foils of plastics; Foils of plastics except for packaging purposes; coated foils of plastic for application in production; coated plastic material for application in production; laminate sheets for application with substrates; decorative plastics films for furniture and furniture parts, walls, home furnishings and floor coverings; embossed decorative plastics films for furniture and furniture parts, walls, home furnishings and floor coverings; decorative plastics films of polypropylene for furniture and furniture parts, walls, home furnishings and floor coverings; embossed decorative plastics films of polypropylene for furniture and furniture parts, walls, home furnishings and floor coverings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |