USPTO serial 98165610
ROUTI-AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIOS, SASHA BOSHART
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROUTI-AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Siheung-si, Gyeonggi, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles G. Zug
Charles G. Zug NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP301 S. COLLEGE ST.SUITE 2300, IP DEPARTMENTCHARLOTTE, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable integrated design automation software for use in mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) engineering design for semiconductor plants; recorded computer software that processes CAD/CAM format data for the import, generation, and output of automated construction design data for use in construction and automated manufacturing; downloadable factory construction automation software for use in algorithmically generating construction MEP (machine, electrical, and plumbing) design layouts; downloadable computer software for use in automating and managing business processes; downloadable computer software for use in processing semiconductor wafers; downloadable database management software applications being downloadable software applications for use in database management; downloadable computer software for use in data and document capture, transmission, storage and indexing; downloadable computer application software for use in implementing the internet of things (IoT) by enabling wireless devices to communicate with each other | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |