USPTO serial 98168420
FRONTLINE COPILOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRONTLINE COPILOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Somerville, MA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lauren K. Tagarao
Lauren K. Tagarao RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP1621 EUCLID AVENUEFLOOR 19CLEVELAND, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software development in the field of artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer vision, data science and software infrastructure; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in creating and displaying visual and non-visual recommendations in the manufacturing, maintenance, and life science industries; Providing software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for use by manufacturing operations professionals for conducting visual quality inspection, object character recognition, code generation, and for image, test and speech classification, all based on artificial intelligence, computer vision, or machine learning; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring non-downloadable computer software for use in management, monitoring, tracking, and training in the field of manufacturing; software as a service (SAAS) featuring non-downloadable computer software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of manufacturing operations; software as a service (SAAS) featuring non-downloadable computer software for use in data analytics using artificial intelligence and machine learning; Providing software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for use by manufacturing operations professionals for displaying shop floor digitalization, continues improvement and providing data to optimize Lean manufacturing practice; Providing software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for use by manufacturing operation engineers, workers and professionals for displaying digitalized operations data in manufacturing industry using artificial intelligence and machine learning, no-code application build and design namely management, monitoring, tracking, and training, for building and maintaining digital processes, and for analytics of production data using artificial intelligence and machine learning. | ACTIVE | Aug 28, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2024 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |