USPTO serial 98168424
TULIP COPILOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TULIP COPILOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lauren K. Tagarao
LAUREN K. TAGARAO RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP1621 EUCLID AVENUEFLOOR 19CLEVELAND, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software development in the field of artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer vision, data science and software infrastructure; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in visual and non-visual recommendations in the nature of manufacturing and life science; Providing software as a service (SAAS) to manufacturing operations professionals for use in visual quality inspection, object character recognition, code generation, image, test and speech classification, based on artificial intelligence, computer vision, machine learning; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring non-downloadable computer software in the field of manufacturing; software as a service (SAAS) featuring non-downloadable computer software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of manufacturing operations; software as a service (SAAS) featuring non-downloadable computer software in the field of data and analytics using artificial intelligence and machine learning; Providing software as a service (SAAS) to manufacturing operations professionals for shop floor digitalization, continues improvement and Lean manufacturing practice; Providing software as a service (SAAS) to manufacturing operation engineers, workers and professionals for digitalized operations in manufacturing using artificial intelligence and machine learning, no-code application build and design, building and maintaining digital processes, analytics of production data using artificial intelligence and machine learning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2024 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |