USPTO serial 98171714
ATHENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATHENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Juan, PR, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P. Johnson
David P. Johnson WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Executive assistant training and coaching services using artificial intelligence in the field of understanding business administration; training and coaching services, namely, implementation of artificial intelligence tools to accomplish personal and professional goals and tasks; executive assistant training and coaching services in the field of implementation of artificial intelligence tools to assist in performing and completing tasks, projects and business processes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence tools for use in recruiting, training, vetting and matching executive assistants to business professionals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |