USPTO serial 98175819
DIMPLE OPTIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTYNOV,VIKTORIIA V
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIMPLE OPTIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
April L. Besl
April L. Besl DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP255 EAST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 1900CINCINNATI, OH 45202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic sports training simulators in the nature of golf simulators; cameras for analyzing the trajectory of golf balls; Golf track ball finder input devices; video cameras for analyzing golf swing; Video cameras for analyzing golf swing; cameras for analyzing golf swing; Apparatus for measuring the speed of golf swing; range finders for golf; Mobile location apparatus for identifying distance to the pin on a golf course; Electronic sports training simulators in the nature of golf simulators for practicing golf; Projection screens for electronic sports training simulators in the nature of golf simulators; Recorded and downloadable computer software for electronic sports training simulators in the nature of golf simulators; Recorded and downloadable computer software for analyzing the trajectory of golf balls; Recorded and downloadable computer software for analyzing golf swing; Recorded and downloadable computer software for measuring the speed of golf swing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 16, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |