USPTO serial 98182182
CACTUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAROTTA, GABRIELLE CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CACTUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter A. Matos
Peter A. Matos MALLOY & MALLOY, P.L.2800 S.W. 3RD AVENUEMIAMI, FL 33129United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | beverage, vitamin enhanced beverage, fortified beverage, functional wellness beverage, drinking water, and vitamin enhanced drinking water vending equipment being vending machines, and components being parts and fittings thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | water bottle filling stations; purified water bottle filling stations; vitamin enhanced water bottle filling stations; purified water fountains; vitamin enhanced water fountains; beverage, vitamin enhanced beverage, fortified beverage, functional wellness beverage, drinking water, and vitamin enhanced drinking water, drink dispensing machines, water filtration apparatus, bottle filling stations, drinking fountains, and components being parts and fittings thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | beverage, vitamin enhanced beverage, fortified beverage, functional wellness beverage, drinking water, and vitamin enhanced drinking water blending equipment, namely, non-electric food blenders, and components being parts and fittings thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | drinking water and vitamin enhanced drinking water vending machine services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | beverage, vitamin enhanced beverage, fortified beverage, functional wellness beverage, drinking water, and vitamin enhanced drinking water replenishment of vending machine services | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | beverage, vitamin enhanced beverage, fortified beverage, functional wellness beverage, drinking water, and vitamin enhanced drinking water blending, dispensing, filtration, filling, and fountain services, namely, preparation of drinks for immediate consumption | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Anthony Bold Ventures, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CACTUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |