Drawing for VIVIDFLAME

USPTO serial 98189866

VIVIDFLAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLLIS, BRIAN J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIVIDFLAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL E. KATTMAN

DANIEL E. KATTMAN REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN S.C.1000 N. WATER STREETSUITE 1700MILWAUKEE, WI 53202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011indoor electric fireplaces, outdoor electric fireplaces, outdoor electric heaters for radiating heatACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 15, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 15, 2026GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2026GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2026CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 24, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 27, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 27, 2025EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 27, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 27, 2025EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 25, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Feb 25, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 25, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 25, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jul 24, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance