USPTO serial 98195383
RACONTEUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NKOJO, RHODA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RACONTEUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Gyeonggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Corey K. Cho
Corey K. Cho SALIWANCHIK, LLOYD & EISENSCHENK, P.A.3107 SW WILLISTON RDGAINESVILLE, FL 32608United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automobile roof racks; roof rack storage containers for land vehicles; tow bars for vehicles; Folding roof tops for vehicles; Racks for vehicles for luggage as attachment to vehicle trunks; roof boxes for vehicles; roof bars for vehicles; luggage carriers for automobiles; sun-blinds adapted for automobiles; camping trailers; motor car convertible tops; pickup truck caps; car-top luggage carriers; automobile roof containers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |