USPTO serial 98210459
VANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Taipei City, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elias Hantula
492 WOOD RIDGE AVEWOOD RIDGE, NJ 07075United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Breath freshening preparations for personal hygiene; Pet shampoos; Pumice stones for personal use; Canned pressurized air for cleaning and dusting purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Candles; Electrical energy; Wax for lighting; Wax for making candles; Waxes being raw materials; Wicks for candles; Wicks for lamps; Christmas tree candles; Scented candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Hair brushes; Vases; Bath sponges; Candle jars; Cosmetic utensils in the nature of thread for eyebrow threading; Hair combs; Incense burners; Non-electric aromatic oil diffusers, other than reed diffusers; Ornaments of glass; Ornaments of porcelain; Toothbrushes for animals | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Matchboxes; Matches; Cigarette papers; Electronic cigarettes; Gas lighters for smokers; Match holders; Wicks for cigarette lighters; Lighter flints | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 5, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |