USPTO serial 98211950
ARC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRATER, JILL I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald Ersler
1165 TERRACE DRIVEELM GROVE, WI 53122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Robots for transporting goods and for loading and unloading goods; robots for transporting pallets, box pallets and rolling containers; robots for machine tools; transport robots for and as part of intralogistics system(s), especially in hospitals and nursing homes; transportation robots; rail-mounted transport robots; rail-mounted transport robots; rail-mounted transport robots for industrial purposes; rail-mounted transport robots for industrial purposes robots for forwarding workpieces and goods; robotic mechanisms for lifting; robotic mechanics for conveying; Robots with articulated arms for manipulating workpieces and goods; robot-controlled goods handling machines and apparatus; robot-controlled apparatus and machines for conveying and for loading and unloading goods; robots for handling materials; industrial robots; rail-mounted industrial robots; rail-mounted industrial robots; self-propelled industrial robots; industrial robots for use in manufacture; indoor self-driving robots for industrial use; rail-mounted industrial robots for industrial purposes; rail-mounted industrial robots for industrial purposes; material handling machinery | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Rail-bound vehicles for control systems; aerial conveyors; rail-guided transport vehicles; rail-bound transport vehicles; self-driving transport vehicles; driverless transport vehicles; remote-controlled rail vehicles; automatic guided vehicles; wheeled containers for the transport of goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |