Drawing for CARDINAL HILL

USPTO serial 98212314

CARDINAL HILL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEE, SANG MIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARDINAL HILL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mathew E. Corr

Mathew E. Corr BOYLE FREDRICKSON S.C.840 NORTH PLANKINTON AVENUEMILWAUKEE, WI 53203United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Stationery, blank writing journals, leather-bound blank journals, printed composition books, paper list pads, stickers, printed flash cards, wall decals, boxed printed note cards, printed address books, sticky notes in the nature of adhesive note paper, printed wall calendars, printed monthly and daily planners, gift bags, foil and paper gift bags, decorative paper bows for wrapping, gift wrapping ribbons of paper, wrapping paper, gift boxes, folding and stacking gift boxes, gift box tissue paper, paper napkins, paper table cloths, decorative paper centerpieces, paper banners, paper decorative garlands for parties, paper gift tags, paper doilies, cardboard boxes being cardboard bakers boxes, printed crossword puzzles, printed greeting cards, boxed printed greeting cardsACTIVE
021Tin pails; plastic plates; cake trays; cake tins; serving platters; plate chargers being dinnerware; bowls; serving tongs; mugs; beverage glassware; wine glasses; champagne flutes; serving utensils, namely, serving spoons and serving forks; paper platesACTIVE
028Inflatable party balloonsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 15, 2025EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 15, 2025EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 15, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 18, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 24, 2025XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 24, 2025GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2025GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2025CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 26, 2024ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 22, 2024PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Oct 1, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 1, 2024XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 1, 2024GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 1, 2024GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 1, 2024CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 30, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 30, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 30, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 4, 2024ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jun 4, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance