USPTO serial 98224901
MC LOUD DEFENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MC LOUD DEFENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEREMY PETER GREEN ECHE
JEREMY PETER GREEN ECHE JPG LEGAL163 23RD ST.BROOKLYN, NY 11232UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | A handheld personal security device comprising of a computer processor, trigger switch, noise generator, wireless transceiver, a directional defensive mechanism, and an electronic camera; personal security alarms comprising handheld, nonlethal, personal protection devices that incorporate multiple technologies to help protect the user from personal attack and bodily harm, namely, computer processor, trigger switch, noise generator, wireless transceiver, a directional defensive mechanism, and an electronic camera | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2025 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 6, 2025 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 6, 2025 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 2025 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2025 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |