Drawing for BURD

USPTO serial 98226205

BURD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 748
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BURD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shermin Lakha

Shermin Lakha LVLUP Legal, P.C.99 Wall Street #1267New York, NY 10005United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail store services featuring necklaces, bracelets, chokers, earrings, anklets, rings, body chains, permanent jewelry; Retail store services featuring necklaces, bracelets, chokers, earrings, anklets, ringsACTIVEJun 15, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2026SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 30, 2026IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Apr 30, 2026EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 4, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 9, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 8, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 24, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 24, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 15, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 15, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Nov 15, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 15, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Sep 17, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 17, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 3, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 4, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 16, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance