USPTO serial 98229751
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Huntingdon, Québec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne Abelman
Julianne Abelman WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP950 THIRD AVENUESUITE 2400, 24TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10022| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Building materials, namely, non-metal countertops for further installation | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Kitchen and bathroom cabinets; kitchen islands being furniture; cupboards; furniture doors; drawers for furniture; towel racks; drawers and cabinets organizers; non-metal doors and drawers handles comprised of wood and antlers; non-metal door hinges; non-metal drawer sliders for furniture | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Assembly services relating to the installation of furniture; installation of kitchen and bathroom cabinets; construction planning | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Furniture delivery | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of furniture and kitchen and bathroom cabinets | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of furniture and kitchen and bathroom cabinets | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |