USPTO serial 98238681
REAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TATE-NAGHI, JACQUELINE P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elias Hantula
492 WOOD RIDGE AVEWOOD RIDGE, NJ 07075United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile applications for managing electronic payment transactions using distributed ledger technology (DLT); Downloadable mobile applications for an electronic financial platform that accommodates multiple types of payment and debt transactions in an integrated mobile phone, PDA, and web-based environment; Downloadable payment gateway software for linking e-commerce websites to credit card processing networks; Electronic and magnetic ID cards for use in connection with payment for services; Electronic payment terminal; Near field communication (NFC) tags for making mobile payments; Point-of-sale terminals for making contactless payments; Multi-functional electronic payment terminals; None of the foregoing related to credit union | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Bill payment services provided via an electronic wallet; Electronic funds transfer; Facilitating and arranging for the financing of contactless credit and debit card payment processing; Financial management in the field of online banking services with integrated bill payment services provided through a website; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a mobile device at a point of sale; None of the foregoing related to credit union | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for for customers to send and receive electronic payments; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for customers to send and receive electronic payments; None of the foregoing related to credit union | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2025 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |