USPTO serial 98252110
EWALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EWALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shenzhen AWP Technology Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen, Guangdong,, CN
Shenzhen AWP Technology Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen, Guangdong,, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yue (Robert) Xu
Yue (Robert) Xu APEX ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP160 ALAMO PLAZA #942ALAMO, CA 94507United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric fences; Computer hardware and downloadable computer software for use in managing, monitoring, and analyzing geo-fences; premises security devices featuring virtual fences using radar apparatus, radio frequency transmitters and receivers, optical position sensors and receivers, thermal imaging cameras, and acoustic meters for monitoring security and safety of premises, detecting premises intrusion, and preventing damage to premises; Counter-drone system comprised of computer hardware and recorded computer software sold together as a unit for the detection, location, tracking, and jamming of radio communications of drones and their controllers; Drone countermeasures systems, namely, radio transmitters for use as radio frequency jamming devices, flashing lasers used to disable and disorient drones, directed energy infrared lasers capable of delivering significant thermal energy at a distance, high powered microwave and RF transmitters capable of disrupting radio receivers and other electronic devices, and visible lasers capable of temporarily and permanently disrupting optical sensors; Unmanned aerial system (UAS) defeat system in the nature of a counter-drone system composed of a multi-spectral avionic sensor system comprising radio frequency, acoustic, radar, and imagery sensors, electronic controllers for sensors, and electronic devices comprising computer hardware and recorded software systems sold together as a unit with electromagnetic apparatus to generate magnetic fields, all for use in detecting, identifying, and disabling UAS in the nature of drones; Electronic devices comprising radio frequency receivers, optical position sensors and receivers, thermal imaging cameras, and acoustic meters for detecting and locating drones; Electronic wireless signal blockers used in security field, namely, electronic apparatus that inhibits the reception of wireless internet and UHF signals used in security field; Aeronautical radio communication machines and apparatus; Radios; Radar apparatus; Apparatus for transmission of communication; Ultrasonic transmitters for non-medical purposes; Electric surveillance installations, namely, cameras, video monitors, microphones, and sound and video recording apparatus; Security surveillance robots; Safety nets; Nets for accident prevention; Security alarms; Detectors for detecting metals, electronic devices, detonation devices, wiretaps, recording devices that facilitate theft and other contraband, all for security purposes | ACTIVE | May 11, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 17, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |