USPTO serial 98252224
THINKLATTICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 819
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THINKLATTICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Antonio, TX, US
San Antonio, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN P. MELEEN
STEPHEN P. MELEEN PIRKEY BARBER PLLC1801 EAST 6TH STREETSUITE 300AUSTIN, TX 78702Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate and personal property appraisal and valuation services; property and casualty insurance brokerage and underwriting services | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2025 |
| 042 | Calculating and simulating flood flows, modeling of areas likely to be inundated, and preparing related reports and technical documentation for financial institutions; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for processing real estate loan origination and real estate loan closing; Quality control for others; Quality management services, namely, quality evaluation and analysis, quality assurance, and quality control; Data automation and collection service using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect service data; Visual home inspection services for sellers and purchasers of residential and commercial properties; all of the foregoing expressly limited to the fields of real estate appraisal and real estate lending services | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2026 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2026 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 5, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2025 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2024 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 26, 2024 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 26, 2024 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |