USPTO serial 98254945
MANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONROE, WA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven W. Edmiston
Steven W. Edmiston Bracepoint Law, P.S.2775 Harbor Ave SW, Ste. DSeattle, WA 98126United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee; Cookies; Flour; Honey; Rice; Tea; Bakery goods; Cardamom; Cereal flour; Instant noodles; Masala powder and spices; Puffed rice; Raw sugar | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 21, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |