USPTO serial 98255028
MANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONROE, WA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven W. Edmiston
Steven W. Edmiston Bracepoint Law, P.S.2775 Harbor Ave SW, Ste. DSeattle, WA 98126United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Butter; Cheese; Clarified butter; Dried beans; Dried lentils; Dried meat; Edible oils and fats, preserves, pickles; Pickled vegetables; Processed beans; Processed lentils; Processed nuts; Processed cashew nuts; Vegetables, dried; Beef jerky; Dried soybeans; Meat jerky, namely, buffalo; Meat jerky, namely, mutton; Yak jerky | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |