Drawing for GROK

USPTO serial 98259466

GROK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GROK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas A. Rettew

Douglas A. Rettew Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP901 New York Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable computer programs and downloadable computer software for the artificial production of human speech and text; downloadable computer programs and downloadable computer software for natural language processing, generation, understanding and analysis; downloadable computer programs and downloadable computer software for machine-learning based language and speech processing software; downloadable computer chatbot software for simulating conversations; downloadable computer programs and downloadable computer software for creating and generating textACTIVE—
042providing online non-downloadable software for the artificial production of human speech and text; providing online non-downloadable software for natural language processing, generation, understanding and analysis; providing online non-downloadable software for machine-learning based language and speech processing software; providing online non-downloadable chatbot software for simulating conversations; providing online non-downloadable software for creating and generating text; research and development services in the field of artificial intelligenceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 23, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 1, 2025ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 2, 2025ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 25, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 19, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 18, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 17, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 7, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2024LOPELETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN—
May 9, 2024LOPELETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 30, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2024EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 28, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2024LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Dec 6, 2023LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Dec 6, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance