Drawing for OPTIONEER

USPTO serial 98261303

OPTIONEER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTIONEER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathryn A. Berryman

Cathryn A. Berryman WINSTEAD PC2728 N. HARWOOD STREETSUITE 500DALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable and recorded computer software for facilitating the compilation of data, for facilitating the identification of and comparison of design, for facilitating the ascertaining of alternative design options, for facilitating the creation of simulation, graphs and building information modeling (BIM) file all for construction projects; downloadable and recorded computer software for optimizations of conceptual designs and for optimizations in estimating applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2025EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2025EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 12, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 24, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance