Drawing for COGITO COMPANION

USPTO serial 98264764

COGITO COMPANION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLEBBE, KEVIN ROBERT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COGITO COMPANION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Y. Jae Kim

Y. Jae Kim Kim IP Law Group LLC129 W Evesham RdVoorhees, NJ 08043United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Application services provider featuring computer application software for using artificial intelligence to provide real-time agent assistance to help contact center agents manage conversations through guidance and personalized coaching.ACTIVEJun 6, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 30, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 25, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 5, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 3, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance