USPTO serial 98265614
SUPERHUMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERHUMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Osborne
David W. Osborne THORPE NORTH & WESTERN, LLP8180 SOUTH 700 EAST, SUITE 350SANDY, UT 84070United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | oxygen concentration and oxygen therapy devices and apparatus for dispensing non-medical, high purity oxygen which are designed to be used while exercising for health and wellness purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | low frequency electromagnetic therapy devices and apparatus; devices and apparatus for providing light therapy, namely for providing red light therapy and/or photobiomodulation therapy; | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring wellness devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing a website featuring videos concerning health and wellness relating to health and wellness therapies, namely, exercise with oxygen therapy, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, red light therapy, photobiomodulation therapy, and devices and apparatuses that incorporate said therapies. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 22, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |