USPTO serial 98267014
POLESTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- INNES, ISABEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 135
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLESTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben Natter
Ben Natter HAUG PARTNERS, LLP745 FIFTH AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10151United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded software for providing real time access and connectivity to automobiles; downloadable and recorded software for automobiles for use in monitoring vehicle status and health, performing diagnostics, providing road side assistance features, taking service requests, vehicle tracking, enabling safety features, and operating basic vehicle features; downloadable computer software for emulating electronic vehicle remotes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software enabling connected access to automobiles; Providing online non-downloadable software for automobiles, for use in monitoring vehicle status and health, performing diagnostics, providing road side assistance features, taking service requests, vehicle tracking, enabling safety features and operating basic vehicle features | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |