Drawing for BECAUSE TRUE AGI SHOULD FEEL LIKE MAGIC

USPTO serial 98281476

BECAUSE TRUE AGI SHOULD FEEL LIKE MAGIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BECAUSE TRUE AGI SHOULD FEEL LIKE MAGIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Spoor Gard

Julia Spoor Gard BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 SOUTH MERIDIAN STREETINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business consulting services, namely, providing assistance in development of business strategies and creative ideation; business consulting services; incubation services, namely, providing work space containing business equipment to freelancers, start-ups, existing businesses and non-profitsACTIVE
036venture capital financing; venture capital fund management; venture capital advisory services; providing venture capital, development capital, private equity and investment funding; venture capital funding services to emerging and start-up companies; venture capital services, namely, providing financing to emerging and start-up companiesACTIVE
042artificial intelligence software and hardware design and development; developing artificial intelligence computer software and hardware; research and development of computer software and hardwareACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 8, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 8, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 30, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 29, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 29, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 29, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 21, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 21, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 25, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance