CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for HALOS

USPTO serial 98288401

HALOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HALOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claudia W. Stangle

Claudia W. Stangle Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.180 N. Stetson Ave.Suite 4900Chicago, IL 60601-6745

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007a near-infrared radiation (NIR) sensor sold as a component of and replacement part for self-propelled and towed forage harvesters, combine harvesters, slurry tankers, field balers, and other agricultural machines, and used to analyze the contents and ingredients of harvested crops and farm slurry in real timeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2026EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Oct 2, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Oct 2, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 8, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 9, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 26, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 19, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 25, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance