USPTO serial 98291304
ZIPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, SLOAN H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT, US
Salt Lake City, UT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dax D. Anderson
Dax D. Anderson Kirton McConkie36 South State Street, Suite 1900Key Bank TowerSalt Lake City, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Data processing services; Business data analysis services in the field of healthcare financial management for individual consumers, businesses and providers, optimizing health reimbursement administration, health plan analytics and compliance, user guidance the provision and consumption of healthcare by individuals, consumers and business; Data processing services in the field of cloud-based software for healthcare financial management and AI-enhanced platforms for optimizing health reimbursement administration; Data services being data management services, business data analysis services, computer data processing services and company, business sector and industry data advisory services in the field of healthcare-related software development | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for healthcare financial management; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software using artificial intelligence for healthcare financial management; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and mobile and computer applications using artificial intelligence for healthcare financial management for individual consumers, businesses and providers for optimizing health reimbursement administration, health plan analytics and compliance by providing user guidance and health plan information; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence for optimizing health reimbursement administration by providing user guidance and health plan information; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence that provides health plan analytics, health plan information and compliance information; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for digital tools in the nature of healthcare financial management for the use in health plan analytics and compliance; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use with AI-enhanced platforms optimizing health reimbursement administration by providing healthcare finanancial management to users; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for providing user guidance in allocating health care spending decisions; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for providing user guidance in allocating health care spending decisions; Advisory services in the field of healthcare-related software development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |