CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for INFLOW

USPTO serial 98292012

INFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BONEN-CLARK, HOPE MICHELLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie E. Reitz

Julie E. Reitz Honigman LLP39400 Woodward Ave., Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Parking management, namely, car parking, parking garage, and parking lot services; Parking management, namely, vehicle parking services relating to the availability of on-street and off-street parking spaces; Parking management, namely, reservation of parking spaces; Parking management, namely, providing information about vehicle parkingACTIVE—
042Providing on-line non-downloadable parking management software; Point of sale system for parking, namely, providing on-line non-downloadable software accessed via a two dimensional code for processing payments for parkingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 11, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 11, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 13, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 28, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 10, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance