USPTO serial 98304891
UNIVERSAL DISPUTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, CHRISTOPHER J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIVERSAL DISPUTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nigamnarayan Acharya
Nigamnarayan Acharya GREENBERG TRAURIG LLPTerminus 2003333 Piedmont Road NE, #2500Atlanta, GA 30305Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Credit card chargeback analysis and chargeback prevention, namely, credit consultation and chargeback recovery services; chargeback recovery services; financial services in the nature of chargeback analysis and prevention, namely, credit card chargeback analysis and chargeback prevention in the field of payment processing; financial services provided to merchants, namely, financial and credit transaction risk assessment and outsourced chargeback recovery services; financial risk management services; merchant banking services; payment transaction dispute processing services; financial and credit transaction risk assessment; financial management, namely, identifying and managing high risk chargeback customers and transactions; financial information management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service featuring software to reduce chargebacks and aid the resolution of billing inquiries and disputes by managing credit card charges; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software to provide chargeback recovery analysis, reports, dispute history and recovery services; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for management of payment disputes; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring, analyzing, and reporting financial transactions and payment data; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for storing, managing, tracking, and analyzing data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |