USPTO serial 98305751
FREE LUNCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 748
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREE LUNCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA, US
Los Angeles, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Ann Novak
Mary Ann Novak Hilgers PLLC1320 Lincoln MallSuite 200Lincoln, NE 68508Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances; providing online non-downloadable audiovisual recordings featuring music and musical entertainment; providing online non-downloadable sound recordings featuring music and musical entertainment; providing a website featuring information in the field of music and entertainment; providing non-downloadable prerecorded musical sound recordings and musical audiovisual recordings via a website; production of sound recordings; production and distribution of videos in the field of musical performances; production of television programs; entertainment services in the nature of development, creation, production, distribution, presentation and post-production of television shows; film and video production; film distribution; music video production; educational services, namely, providing internships and apprenticeships in the field of music, television, film, and video production; mentoring services for inner-city youth in the field of personal development and music, television, film, and video production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 5, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2026 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 4, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 3, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |