USPTO serial 98306283
DAWGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATT, JAIME L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAWGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER HELLMICH
CHRISTOPHER HELLMICH HELLMICH LAW GROUP PC40101 MONTEREY AVE, B1 #419RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Flexible clogs and sandals composed predominantly of ethylvinylacetate sold through online retail sites or specialty footwear retail outlets | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 28, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 28, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2024 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |