Drawing for EVE

USPTO serial 98316438

EVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew T. Pettit

Andrew T. Pettit Perkins Coie LLPP.O. Box 2608Seattle, WA 98111United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Internet-connected wide-area network (WAN) hardware for use with unmanned aerial vehicles for emergency response; downloadable computer programs concerning vehicle control, namely, computer programs for operation and control of unmanned aerial vehicles and aerial drones; downloadable computer programs for fully- or semi-autonomous control of unmanned aerial vehicles; control apparatus in the nature of electronic controllers for unmanned aerial vehicles; downloadable computer programs for managing networks of unmanned aerial vehicles and coordinating traffic of those unmanned aerial vehicles; downloadable computer programs for managing fully- or semi-autonomous aerial assessment and point-to-point aerial logistics of unmanned aerial vehicles; downloadable computer programs for interpreting data generated by unmanned aerial vehicles; downloadable computer programs for encrypting and transmitting video generated by unmanned aerial vehicles; downloadable computer programs for uploading data generated by unmanned aerial vehicles to a distributed storage mechanism; downloadable computer programs for uploading data generated by unmanned aerial vehicles to a blockchain; accessories for unmanned aerial vehicles, namely, electronic docking stations used to recharge unmanned aerial vehicles; electronic docking stations for recharging unmanned aerial vehicles without requiring operator interventionACTIVE—
012Aerial drones; unmanned aerial vehicles; quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle for reconnaissance tasks; unmanned aerial vehicles for assessing scenes and providing transportation, inspection, photography, filming, and mapping as necessary; unmanned aerial vehicles for emergency response; internet-connected unmanned aerial vehicles that autonomously conduct waypoint and bounding missions, returning to respective docking stations for charging when those missions are completeACTIVE—
042Internet-connected computer network configuration services for drone first responder hardware; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software concerning vehicle control, namely, computer programs for operation and control of unmanned aerial vehicles and aerial dronesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 13, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 13, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 2, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 1, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Dec 5, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance