Drawing for HUEY

USPTO serial 98332105

HUEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CAYSIDO, REBECCA TOLENTINO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HUEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer A. Van Kirk

Jennifer A. Van Kirk Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP201 East Washington Street, Suite 1200Phoenix, AZ 85004United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Credit union services; Credit union services by providing financial information through online customer assistance via an interactive computer chat bot relating to credit union servicesACTIVE
042Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable interactive chatbot software for replying to questions from customers and for obtaining financial information in the field of credit union servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 14, 2025EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 14, 2025EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 14, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 18, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 27, 2025XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 27, 2025GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2025GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2025CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 23, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 23, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 23, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED
Sep 25, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 9, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 27, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance