Drawing for ROGZ

USPTO serial 98333459

ROGZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 692
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, BRIDGET ANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROGZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith W. Medansky

Keith W. Medansky DLA Piper LLP (US)P.O. Box 64807Chicago, IL 60606-0089United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Playthings and toys for domestic pets, namely, toys for pets in the nature of activity toys, flying discs, toys for pets in the nature of fetch toys, plush toys, toys for pets in the nature of treat dispenser toys, chew toys for pets, not edible, toys for pets in the nature of rope toys, toys for pets in the nature of treat toys, not edible, toys for pets in the nature of dental toys, toys for pets in the nature of pet ballsACTIVE—
031Foodstuffs for animals, namely, pet food, edible pet treats and pet food in the nature of pet snacksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2026ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jan 14, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Oct 8, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 8, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Mar 5, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance