USPTO serial 98354318
CURL REMEDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CURL REMEDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gloria Tsui-Yip
Gloria Tsui-Yip Gottlieb, Rackman & Reisman, P.C.270 Madison Ave. 8th FloorNew York, NY 10016United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair care products, namely, heat protection sprays; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair conditioner; Hair creams; Hair curling preparations; Hair detangler preparations; Hair detangling preparations; Hair emollients; Hair gel; Hair glaze; Hair lotion; Hair mousse; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair pomades; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair sheen spray; Hair spray; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling preparations; Hair texture cream; Hair texturizers; Hair tonic; Hair waving preparations; Oils for hair conditioning; Shampoo-conditioners; Styling foam for hair; Styling sprays for curly hair; Non-medicated hair restoration lotions; Non-medicated hair serums; Non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; Non-medicated bonding hair care preparations; Non-medicated repair hair care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |