USPTO serial 98354814
ANTHESIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANTHESIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Congleton, Cheshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JESSICA S. SACHS
Jessica S. Sachs Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200Troy, MI 48098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consultancy for services for digital transformation; office functions; human resource management and recruitment services; computerised employment data verification; database management services; data processing; business data management; computerised file management; customer relationship management; accountancy; retail store services and wholesale store services featuring computer software; consultancy, information and advisory services relating to all the aforesaid services; all of the aforesaid services in the field of IT; none of the aforesaid services relating to the environment and sustainability fields | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | IT and computer project management services; technological consultancy services for digital transformation; software consultancy services; technical support services in the nature of troubleshooting and maintenance services for computer software; quality assurance consultancy in the field of information technology; maintenance and updating of software for communication systems; technological planning services in the field of information technology; computer software consultancy; computer programming; computer software installation; computer design services; maintaining database software; electronic storage of digital media, namely, images, text, and audio data; hosting of digital content on the Internet; providing temporary use of non-downloadable and web-based computer software for digital asset management; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for use in database management, for word processing, for use as a spreadsheet; Software as a service (SAAS), namely, hosting software by others for use in database management, for word processing, for use as a spreadsheet; Software as a service (SAAS) in the nature of hosting cloud based software of others; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring software for use in database management, for word processing, for use as a spreadsheet; infrastructure as a services (IaaS), namely, hosting servers for use by others; information, consultancy and advisory services relating to all the aforesaid services; all of the aforesaid services in the field of IT and the implementation and enhancement of enterprise resource planning software; none of the aforesaid services relating to the environment and sustainability fields | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 23, 2025 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 16, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |