USPTO serial 98354876
GOOD COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, CATHERINE ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with GOOD COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Scott
James L. Scott Privus PLC7125 Headley Street SEUnit 1084Ada, MI 49301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Blank recordable DVDs and other pre-recorded digital recording media devices featuring music and music performances; downloadable computer software for creating music videos, producing audio recordings, and listening to music; digital music downloadable from the internet; downloadable electronic publications, namely, articles, newsletters, booklets, and brochures in the field of music and entertainment; prerecorded magnetic data carriers featuring music | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising services; Developing promotional campaigns for business; Entertainment marketing services, namely, marketing, promotion and advertising for recording and performing artists; Promoting the concerts of others; Promotional marketing services; Publicity agency services; business collaboration services, namely, promoting collaboration within the music industry to achieve advances in the field of entertainment; online retail store services featuring entertainment products in the nature of digital music and audiovisual content | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Music production services; Music publishing services; Providing online music, not downloadable, all the aforesaid services in relation to the business of a music record label and not in connection with the production of music videos or other audio-visual content | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Legal services relating to protection and exploitation of intellectual property relating to sound and visual materials; Internet-based personal introduction services; on-line personal social networking services; information and advisory services relating to the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Good Company Records Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named GOOD COMPANY
- Prosecution event GNRN explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 10, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |