USPTO serial 98354902
CARROUSEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 647Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COUEY,JORDAN ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with CARROUSEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GIOVANNA H. FESSENDEN
GIOVANNA H. FESSENDEN HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, P.C.155 SEAPORT BLVD.BOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | fresh fruits; fresh vegetables | ACTIVE | May 17, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 8, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |